Speaking about how people are communicating, I noticed how that people in my chosen subject, human enhancement, are using some common trends in their arguments. A very common trend was using logic and quoting other credible people, which appeared in nearly all of my applicable sources that are in the final annotated bibliography post (obviously a source that is a painting in a web gallery won't have an argument. If you doubt me you're welcome to try and find a valid argument being made on the listed source.) In regards to the form of their communications, a good majority of the material I found were scholarly essays and articles from news site.
Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/byways/photos/62736 |
Its embarrassing to admit but a rather large flaw in my writing was pointed out to me. The flaw being that I tend to be wordy and add unneeded sentences to a paragraph. (I'm probably still doing that and not noticing to be honest.) I've never been good at self-appraising my strengths in my writing, but I believe that I did the hyperlinking correctly at least, I'm pretty sure that I included links to all relevant source material, as well as thing that my audience might be interested in. I can definitely improve what sentences I add to my works, since that was a major problem I had in the assignment. Also, writing down analysis of the rhetoric used could definitely use some work (I felt like it was severely lacking a day later.) But to some up the most important thing that I learned. Make sure what I'm writing actually answers the prompt. Having to rewrite the entire paper to account for that mistake was not fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment